PropertyESP recently attended the UDIA lunch with Alannah MacTiernan, Federal Member for Perth, who spoke about her views on Perth’s planning and the DAPs.
Following from her time as WA’s Planning Minister, Alannah was very keen to reintroduce the concept of democratic planning. This methodology focuses on involving people (i.e. the community and stakeholders) in the planning process, in order to create a design that meets everyone’s needs.
In its truest form, democratic planning is an ideal model and one which Samantha Reece utilised herself when she was CEO of SMR.
However it appears the former Minister has been using this model to discredit the DAP process.
She recently held a session with 100 attendees in Mt Lawley and this drew criticism for the DAP process and the fact that residents had no sway over their own communities.
However as Samantha Reece pointed out to Alannah at the lunch – if you were to put 100 developers into a room, the feelings towards DAPs would be very different and if the process was to be truly democratic, there needed to be a cross section of the community represented.
Alannah’s main criticisms of DAPs were two-fold: the lack of elected members on the DAPs and lack of transparency with final planning decisions.
Alannah felt that elected members needed to be involved in the process to reflect the views of their communities.
And then she spoke of the Bayswater town centre development, which had a two storey height limit. This had been revised to five stories (under pressure), and yet the DAP awarded seven stories. Alannah felt that it was inappropriate that the DAP did not take into regard the City’s wishes or their planning scheme with this decision.
For us at PropertyESP, it was quite clearly the case that the DAP believed that the most appropriate height for the town centre to provide continued economic viability was in fact seven stories.
And while Alannah very cleverly pointed out that the DAP process is more expensive and not any faster than the normal Council approval process, what she failed to acknowledge was that some Councils are still sitting on the same Town Planning Scheme as they were 20 years ago.
There is no doubt that DAP’s have some aspects still to be ironed out, but they definitely have a role to play in Perth’s future. Our concern at PropertyESP is that some parties have DAPs in their firing line and that would not be a positive outcome for the Perth development sector – at all!
If you enjoy reading PropertyESP’s blog then please share it on your pages or with friends. We hear our commentary is quite engaging!